Skip to Content

Why it is dangerous to throw away prophets you dislike

I have noticed a growing trend within my conversations with Church members. Many members disagree with the teachings or actions of various prophets and seem to simply discard the prophet and ignore him. For example, whenever I share a quote about freedom from Ezra Taft Benson, progressive Latter-day Saints lose their minds that I am quoting him. They slander and attack him and rationalize why they are justified in ignoring his teachings. I could share similar examples with Brigham Young and various other prophets.

But there is a problem with throwing away a prophet like Ezra Taft Benson or Brigham Young because you disagree with them; well, there are actually many problems, but I want to highlight just two major problems that come when you throw away a prophet.

1st. The example we are setting and the damage we are doing to our children.

Many members claim that they are active members of the Church but then disregard prophetic teachings when they disagree with them. They rationalize by saying things like, “Oh it was only Ezra Taft Benson who decried socialism, so I can ignore him.” or “That was 20 years ago! And not important anymore.” Or “That’s only their opinion! I prayed and I was told I am right.” And whereas these excuses to criticize the prophets are flawed, and each can be debunked (click here for a quote collection debunking of the claim about Benson), there is another danger that they pose, the example to our children.

We are setting examples to our families, and those young in the gospel, on how to act. When we disregard the prophet and his teachings, the message children hear regarding disobedience is loud and clear! Elder Richard L. Evans in the Oct. 1964 General Conference taught, “if a parent goes a little off course, the children are likely to exceed the parent’s example.” And in the April 2003 General Conference Elder Jeffrey R. Holland taught:

“No child in this Church should be left with uncertainty about his or her parents’ devotion to the Lord Jesus Christ, the Restoration of His Church, and the reality of living prophets and apostles who, now as in earlier days, lead that Church according to “the will of the Lord, … the mind of the Lord, … the word of the Lord, … and the power of God unto salvation.” In such basic matters of faith, prophets do not apologize for requesting unity, indeed conformity, in the eloquent sense that the Prophet Joseph Smith used that latter word. In any case, as Elder Neal Maxwell once said to me in a hallway conversation, ‘There didn’t seem to be any problem with conformity the day the Red Sea opened.'”

Parents simply cannot flirt with skepticism or cynicism, then be surprised when their children expand that flirtation into full-blown romance. If in matters of faith and belief children are at risk of being swept downstream by this intellectual current or that cultural rapid, we as their parents must be more certain than ever to hold to anchored, unmistakable moorings clearly recognizable to those of our own household. It won’t help anyone if we go over the edge with them, explaining through the roar of the falls all the way down that we really did know the Church was true and that the keys of the priesthood really were lodged there but we just didn’t want to stifle anyone’s freedom to think otherwise. No, we can hardly expect the children to get to shore safely if the parents don’t seem to know where to anchor their own boat.”

When we discard the prophets who are calling us to repentance, we are laying the foundations of the destruction of our own family. To drive home the point Elder Holland related the following story: “Not long ago Sister Holland and I met a fine young man who came in contact with us after he had been roaming around through the occult and sorting through a variety of Eastern religions, all in an attempt to find religious faith. His father, he admitted, believed in nothing whatsoever. But his grandfather, he said, was actually a member of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. “But he didn’t do much with it,” the young man said. “He was always pretty cynical about the Church.” From a grandfather who is cynical to a son who is agnostic to a grandson who is now looking desperately for what God had already once given his family!”

In April 2012 General Conference, Bishop Richard C. Edgley related a similar story highlighting the heartbreaking dangers of leading our children out of the gospel:

A few months ago after a meeting with new converts and less-active members, a reactivated gentleman about my age came up to me and said, “I am one who has been less active most of my life. I fell away from the Church early in my life. But I am back now, and I work in the temple with my wife.”

To let him know that everything was OK, my response was something like this: “All is well that ends well.”

He responded, “No, all is not well. I am back in the Church, but I have lost all of my children and my grandchildren. And I am now witnessing the loss of my great-grandchildren—all out of the Church. All is not well.”

2nd. You can’t stop at throwing just one prophet away.

Something you might not have realized is that the prophets and apostles sustain each other. They are servants of the same Master. Just because you disagree with one of the prophets does not change the fact that they are all intertwined. Ignorance of our history often causes you to think you can throw just one prophet to get rid of an uncomfortable doctrine or aspect of Church history, but you can’t.

For example, I recently talked with someone who wanted to throw away just Brigham Young. They were upset that while Brigham was the prophet the prohibition of blacks receiving the priesthood started. They hated him for this. The point I was making was we don’t understand the “why” the Lord did it and we should refrain from speculating. They were upset and said it did not come from the Lord, rather Brigham Young was simply a racist. It sounded simple enough! Brigham Young was the prophet, and he was the bad guy in their book. Use him as a scapegoat and then throw him and the issue away!

But there is a problem with their logic! Like most issues where people try to throw away prophets, Brigham Young was not alone. To this person I explained, that to believe that the policy of blacks and the priesthood was born out of racism, requires one to also throw away other prophets. For example, if it was only the racism of Brigham Young, then how do you explain John Taylor denying Elijah Abel’s request to be sealed to his family after Brigham’s death? If Brigham denied it because he was a racist, was John Taylor a racist too?

And then you have Heber J. Grant, George Albert Smith, David O. McKay, Joseph Fielding Smith, and Harold B. Lee all received letters from Black Africa requesting the Church send missionaries and that faithful black members receive the Priesthood. Those letters got the response that the time was not yet. Were they racist too? The excuse of racism will soon cause you to throw away the majority of the Latter-day Prophets. Are you willing to do that? There is another obvious choice, one can simply realize the truth. The prohibition came from the Lord. We don’t know why, but it did. Making up reasons or throwing away prophets to avoid the issue will not work.

We can follow the example of Anthony Obinna who was denied the gospel and the priesthood for nearly 20 years! But when Spencer W. Kimball received the revelation extending the Priesthood to all worthy members rather than reacting bitterly, Anthony Obinna wrote the following to the prophet regarding his revelation:

“Dear Brethren,

“All the members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints in this part of Nigeria have the pleasure to thank you and the Latter-day Saints throughout the world for opening the door for the Gospel to come to our people in its fullness.

“We are happy for the many hours in the Upper Room of the Temple you spent praying to the Lord to bring us into the fold. We thank our Heavenly Father for hearing your prayers and ours and by revelation. He has confirmed the long promised day, and has granted the holy priesthood to us, with the power to exercise its divine authority and enjoy every blessing of the temple.

“There is no doubt that the Church here will grow and become a mighty center for the Saints and bring progress enough to the people of Nigeria as it is doing all over the world.”

Story of a Nigerian Member By Anthony Uzodimma Obinna

I can’t even fathom the faith of the early Saints in Africa who not only held on to their testimony of the gospel during the prohibition but shared the gospel with their friends! Their faith inspires me to be a better member. Imagine the faith it would take to be a black person, sharing the gospel with your black friends, and explaining to them why they should join a Church that was denying you the priesthood and would deny them it also! But the miracle is that not only did they share the gospel, but it spread like wildfire. When the missionaries arrived in Black Africa there were thousands of unofficial members of the Church waiting for them.

While many white Saints in Europe and America struggle with Brigham Young and throw him, and the entire Church away, Saints in Africa love the prophets and share the gospel with their friends! There are now more members of the Church in Africa than in Europe! That is right! There are more Nigerian Latter-day Saints than there are British Latter-day Saints! They also have 16 temples in operation, under construction, or announced in Africa!

Find Safety with the Keys.

It is hard when the Prophet says something or does something we disagree with. But when we swallow our pride and humbly follow the Prophet we are blessed. Now am I saying that the prophets and apostles are perfect or infallible? No, but I am echoing the words of Joseph Smith who taught, “I will give you a key that will never rust, if you will stay with the majority of the Twelve Apostles, and the records of the Church, you will never be led astray.”

I testify that I know that Joseph Smith was a prophet of God. And so was Brigham Young, John Taylor, Ezra Taft Benson, and others. They might say things I struggle to understand, but fidelity to truth means that I sustain them even when I don’t fully understand or agree with them for they are the key holders of the priesthood and the prophets on earth that Christ has given us in these last days.

In closing, I echo the words of our current prophet, Russell M. Nelson: “My experience is that once you stop putting question marks behind the prophet’s statements and put exclamation points instead, and do it, the blessings just pour.”

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Naomi Crosby

Sunday 12th of June 2022

Many years ago one of our beloved church presidents passed away. His successor was a man of whom I had been quite critical. I never told anyone what I thought but kept it to myself. About two weeks later I attended stake conference where we had our first opportunity to sustain our new prophet. As his name was presented I in my mind a voice mildly chastising me with these words, Get your hand up there. I raised my hand. I realized that this man was indeed called as our Heavenly Father's prophet. Since then I have always sustained our leaders with gratitude. They may have imperfections but they are called and guided to fulfill their callings by He who is perfect, not by imperfect mortals.

S. Murray

Wednesday 24th of November 2021

I agree with your article, yet some things I've read can't help but cause some cognitive (or maybe spiritual) dissonance. I believe when a man is appointed the prophet, those things he says that are inspired of the Lord are true and of great worth. But I'm not sure I can believe everything he says (or does) is in fact 100% inspired, even when speaking directly from his role as the prophet. For instance, did you know Brigham Young apparently said this (which I found on fairmormon, a site I trust pretty well on these matters): "Shall I tell you the law of God in regard to the African race? If the white man who belongs to the chosen seed mixes his blood with the seed of Cain, the penalty, under the law of God, is death on the spot. This will always be so. The nations of the earth have transgressed every law that God has given, they have changed the ordinances and broken every covenant made with the fathers, and they are like a hungry man that dreameth that he eateth, and he awaketh and behold he is empty."

He said mixing races was punishable by death under God's law. And that it would always be so. This is obviously wrong. And he's obviously not saying it as a matter of personal opinion, but proclaiming it as spiritual truth from the position of prophet. That said, I don't 'throw away' all of his words or deeds, but I take them with a bit more of a grain of salt now, and might pray about their truth rather than trust them as easily as I do some other prophetic teachings. And it brings up a lot of questions. Just how much free will and error will the Lord allow a prophet to exercise? Just how much of that error can be permitted to influence the church? Is it possible that things like the priesthood prohibition could have not been inspired by God? In my mind this possibility wouldn't make the following prophets automatically racist. In the political climate of the times, the church re-allowing African American men to hold the priesthood could have caused a great stir of negative media and/or alienated members of the church who held racist views at the time but would later slowly come around in time for the policy's reversal. Those reasons alone might potentially be enough justification to delay reversing it. I suppose they might even be contributing factors to the reasons if the policy WAS inspired of God. But to me there's still the question, once a man becomes a prophet, how much error would the Lord allow...? The quote above seems to indicate that in those days at least, allowable errors could include untrue spiritual proclamations of God's will in regards to an entire race. I think and hope much less error would be allowed these days.

S. Murray

Wednesday 24th of November 2021

@Jeremy, thank you very much for taking the time to reply. Your answers were very informative (I had no idea about the origins of the journal of discourses nor their credibility). Hopefully this is an instance of BY being misquoted by the JD's author, but even if not, it was useful to read you other article and put old quotes through the 'tests' to see how authoritative they are. Thank you for continuing to write these articles and sharing your knowledge and faith with the public.

Jeremy

Wednesday 24th of November 2021

Hey S. Murray,

A couple of things to unpack there.

1st. A prophet is a prophet only when he is acting as a prophet. As such, I wrote this to help people discern when they are acting as a prophet: https://mylifebygogogoff.com/2021/09/how-can-i-tell-if-a-quote-from-a-general-authority-is-authoritative.html

2nd. Statements by BY. One of the biggest dangers of 'statements by BY' is that often they rely on the JD, and the JD is NOT authoritative. They were written with good intent by a member, but they were collected often many years after the discourse. So I take everything that is claimed he said by a grain of salt even if it is on Fairmormon. (See the above article)

3rd. Mixed marriages. The reason mixed marriages were denounced so much is that they would prevent temple marriage and all children could not receive the gospel. So in a sense, it caused spiritual death in terms of gospel progression. And so thus it was something that was harshly condemned. After Blacks and the Priesthood revelation, the teachings on the dangers of mixed marriages no longer applied as the policy was changed.

4th. What we don't know. Simply put, we don't know the why. And unless the Lord reveals the why, any assumptions will cause issues in the long run. For more see https://mylifebygogogoff.com/2019/07/the-mistake-latter-day-saints-made-with-the-priesthood-restriction-and-how-we-are-repeating-it.html

Diane Taylor

Monday 6th of September 2021

I am reminded of Elijah leaving Jerico after trying to convince Ahab to follow the teachings of Israel to no avail and when he was leaving the city, a gang of children accosted him..calling him names n throwing rocks at him when 2 giant she-bears came out of the woods and decimated the group, leaving only 50 alive to run home..so we take our lives and our baptism in jeopardy when we maligne the Lords annointed.

Carlos Jones

Thursday 2nd of September 2021

I'm an African-American member of the church who's parents joined in 1978. Because of the faith needed to trust in the Lord and the church despite the absence of the priesthood for so long, it has left me with a strong desire to serve. The issues that's going around in the world has very little affect on me when it comes to my testimony. I've always just did what the prophet and church has taught and it's carried me through life pretty easily compared to a lot of my friends that hasn't had to deal with many faith trying situations.

Eric Redd

Thursday 26th of August 2021

Recent quote from a Seventy, “So let’s drop the dead prophets and embrace the living.” Seventy Richard N. Holzapfel

Are you going to get inline with this like you did the Jab?

I know what you are thinking. But, He was speaking in his official capacity as a Seventy to a congregation of Saints.

But, lets go with your best thinking MyLifeByGoGoGoff.

Jeremy

Thursday 26th of August 2021

I don't think we need to drop the dead ones, but simply stop pitting them against the living. And yes, I am following the First Presidency's recent letter. Here is an article I wrote on that. https://mylifebygogogoff.com/2021/08/an-unvaccinated-latter-day-saints-response-to-the-first-presidency-urging-vaccinations.html

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Jojobet GirişJojobetbetwoonjojobetcasibomcasibombetcio giriş