The following is from Matthew 15:22-28, and it is vital to understand how God always works systematically, and what we call restriction are normal in the Gospel.
22 And, behold, a woman of Canaan came out of the same coasts, and cried unto him, saying, Have mercy on me, O Lord, thou Son of David; my daughter is grievously vexed with a devil.
23 But he answered her not a word. And his disciples came and besought him, saying, Send her away; for she crieth after us.
24 But he answered and said, I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel.
25 Then came she and worshipped him, saying, Lord, help me.
26 But he answered and said, It is not meet to take the children’s bread, and to cast it to dogs.
27 And she said, Truth, Lord: yet the dogs eat of the crumbs which fall from their masters’ table.
28 Then Jesus answered and said unto her, O woman, great is thy faith: be it unto thee even as thou wilt. And her daughter was made whole from that very hour.
Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost:
Matthew 28:19
After that, they only taught the JEWISH people, they strictly forbid gentiles. Until Peter who was the leader of the Apostles had the vision as recorded in Acts 10-11 where the restriction was lifted, and the gentiles were taught the Gospel.
It was always understood to be temporary
God does not “change” and neither do His decrees, He is consistent. Perceived inconstancy normally comes from a lack of our understanding of His commands. A common misunderstanding is that “God restricted blacks from the Priesthood and that in 1978 He ‘Changed’ his mind” or the idea that the church caved to the social pressure and stopped being “racists” and changed the doctrine. Neither of these are true, and is at best a misunderstanding, and at worse the works of Satan.
VITAL POINT The restriction was barring blacks from the Priesthood, NOT from the Gospel, they were still taught Faith, Repentance, Baptism, the Gift of the Holy Ghost, and enduring to the end, the Gospel restriction Jesus taught had been lifted, just as the restriction on the priesthood one day would be. But in the Lords time, not man’s. The Prophets understood this and taught the following.
“When all the rest of the children have received their blessings in the Holy Priesthood, then that curse will be removed from the seed of Cain, and they will then come up and possess the Priesthood, and receive all the blessings which we are now entitled to.”
Brigham Young
“The day will come when all that race will be redeemed and possess all the blessings which we now have.”
Wilford Woodruff
“Every soul coming into this world came here with the promise that through obedience he would receive the blessings of salvation. No person was foreordained or appointed to sin or to perform a mission of evil. No person is ever predestined to salvation or damnation.”
Joseph Fielding Smith
“It’s only a matter of time before the black achieves full status in the Church. We must believe in the justice of God. The black will achieve full status, we’re just waiting for that time.”
Harold B. Lee said
The “Restriction”
Not Man’s Time Or Doctrine
The ridiculous idea is that the church “changed the doctrine” because it was socially acceptable to do so, is false. There are 2 vital flaws with this anti.
First. Even if you believe the church is not true and led by Jesus Christ, which it is. If the church was trying to play on social issues, they would’ve “changed the doctrine” before 1978. The Civil rights moments had happened in the ’50s and ’60s if they were trying to tap into that, they would’ve “changed the doctrine” in the ’50s and ’60s, not in 1978.
Second. This false idea is based on the false understanding of the above doctrines. It is based on a lie that the doctrines of the church needed to be changed and that they were racists. Doctrines don’t change, it was not the doctrine or restriction of man. It was the Lord’s doctrine of timing, and His restriction, and in His timing, the restriction would be lifted. Doctrines did not change, and doctrines could not change, but temporary restrictions were lifted like had happened before.
Lifting the restriction
When The Lords Time Came
June 8, 1978
As we have witnessed the expansion of the work of the Lord over the earth, we have been grateful that people of many nations have responded to the message of the restored gospel, and have joined the Church in ever-increasing numbers. This, in turn, has inspired us with a desire to extend to every worthy member of the Church all of the privileges and blessings which the gospel affords.
Aware of the promises made by the prophets and presidents of the Church who have preceded us that at some time, in God’s eternal plan, all of our brethren who are worthy may receive the priesthood, and witnessing the faithfulness of those from whom the priesthood has been withheld, we have pleaded long and earnestly in behalf of these, our faithful brethren, spending many hours in the Upper Room of the Temple supplicating the Lord for divine guidance.
He has heard our prayers, and by revelation has confirmed that the long-promised day has come when every faithful, worthy man in the Church may receive the holy priesthood, with power to exercise its divine authority, and enjoy with his loved ones every blessing that flows therefrom, including the blessings of the temple. Accordingly, all worthy male members of the Church may be ordained to the priesthood without regard for race or color. Priesthood leaders are instructed to follow the policy of carefully interviewing all candidates for ordination to either the Aaronic or the Melchizedek Priesthood to insure that they meet the established standards for worthiness.
We declare with soberness that the Lord has now made known his will for the blessing of all his children throughout the earth who will hearken to the voice of his authorized servants, and prepare themselves to receive every blessing of the gospel.
Sincerely yours,
Spencer W. Kimball
N. Eldon Tanner
Marion G. Romney
The First Presidency
But… But… But…
To those who’ve “But so and so said this, or that” in reply to the frailty of man Bruce R. McConkie said:
“Forget everything I have said, or what…Brigham Young…or whomsoever has said…that is contrary to the present revelation. We spoke with a limited understanding and without the light and knowledge that now has come into the world.”
~ Bruce R. McConkie
Conclusion
…he (Jesus Christ) inviteth them all to come unto him and partake of his goodness; and he denieth none that come unto him, black and white, bond and free, male and female; and he remembereth the heathen; and all are alike unto God, both Jew and Gentile.
2 Nephi 26:33
Our duty is now to share the Gospel with all men and make sure that we like our Savior denieth none. The Gospel is for all; the blessings of the Priesthood are available for all.
PS I do not speak for the church, the church does not condone any theories of “why” there was a restriction, this is not a theory of “why” there was a restriction.
This simply states that the restriction is consistent with God’s dealings with men. If you have issues with God and how He deals with things both in the Old Testament and New Testament and in our day. Maybe the problem is not God, but you.
PPS This is an awesome video about the lifting of the restriction, and the growth in Africa. It is the story of the Church’s first convert in Nigeria, Anthony Obinna.

A friendly guy
Friday 20th of April 2018
Indeed, doctrine does not change. Eternal Truths remain true and never can be changed. Furthermore, I'd like to clarify that when there are changes in the church, it is the policy and organization that changes, but never the doctrines as stated.
Cary
Friday 21st of August 2015
If you also consider the eternal perspective of the gospel, you realize that although they couldn't hold the Priesthood for a time, it was taught they one day would (as you said) - but this also implies that those who hadn't received the Priesthood would eventually be able to receive the Priesthood and all Priesthood and temple ordinances, even if vicariously after their death.
Anonymous
Tuesday 18th of August 2015
ӏ gοtta favߋrite thiѕ աebsite it seems verfy beneficial invaluable
A Volstorf
Tuesday 18th of August 2015
I only know my heart and the trials I have personally endured as a member. Not God, but some men (includes women) still are not ready to extend a welcoming hand to people of color. Justification of pass doctrine makes the current sting no less hurtful today. I hold tight to the gospel and not the people, for it has helped me endure some of the most trying times of my life. The divide is still at hand.
JLeach
Tuesday 18th of August 2015
Unfortunately, this can be said for people of different classes and monetary positions. If someone wants to hold themselves over other people in pride, they will. Don't forget the Zoramites. What I have learned is that regardless of what other people may say and do, regardless of the positions that they hold in their ward/branch the only thing that is important remains the same: that this is the Church of Jesus Christ and not anyone else's. You put God first and counsel with him, and nothing else really matters. We are all here to learn to be like Christ and to come unto him and everyone is at different places in their lives (hopefully) trying to do just that. Forgive others their trespasses and hope that they will do the same for you. Christ lives. The Book of Mormon is true. And God loves you and I and everyone else.
Jeremy
Tuesday 18th of August 2015
Many Jews had issues when the Gospel was taken to the gentiles also, it is sad when members are not willing to welcome everyone.
Bryan
Monday 17th of August 2015
How does any ban make sense in light of the first article of faith?
In other words, if the LDS church teaches we are to be punished only for the sins that we commit ourselves, how can you attempt to justify denying the priesthood to a group of people based on an ancient scriptural reference lacking any connection to the individual's choices in life?
Jay Lawrence
Saturday 22nd of August 2015
We had free agency before mortality. In this life we are given certain circumstances based on God' perfect knowledge of our self developed dispositions.
JLeach
Tuesday 18th of August 2015
Having the priesthood withheld and not being punished for the sins of others are not the same thing. The priesthood is a sacred responsibility to be able to act with Gods power in His name. Not being punished for Adams, your parents or anyone else's sins means that God will judge you for your actions and no one else's. Only God can determine who is allowed to act with His power in His name and no one else. Having this power withheld was not and has never meant to be a punishment. Instead, it was another trial of faith that those who would follow Him had to endure. However, just because they did not have this power in this life does not mean that they will never have this power in the next one. Remember, there is life after death and God does not distinguish between the two.
Jeremy
Monday 17th of August 2015
First off, the First article of Faith is "We believe in God, the Eternal Father, and in His Son, Jesus Christ, and in the Holy Ghost."
Second, it is about timing and covenants, not about sin. This is a pattern of the Bible.